Rochester Region Federal Funds Dashboard
How the Rochester Region Is Spending Federal Recovery Dollars
The federal government provided unprecedented levels of flexible relief funds to local governments across the country, including those in the Rochester region, to help them recover from the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the City of Rochester and Monroe County continue to allocate and spend these federal recovery funds, they have an unparalleled opportunity to not only stimulate economic recovery from the pandemic, but to also increase equity and remediate some of the past inequities that have been built into our nation’s laws and programs. To do so, the funds must be used to ensure that everyone–especially historically excluded groups–can benefit from and contribute to economic growth.
To increase transparency in this process, this dashboard tracks data on how the City of Rochester and Monroe County have allocated and spent a portion of these recovery funds: State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) provided through the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). SLFRF must be obligated by the end of 2024 and spent by the end of 2026. The dashboard focuses on SLFRF because of their flexibility in giving local governments authority to decide how they should be spent. And, they tended to be spent on longer term recovery efforts rather than on short term emergency public health response, which was the focus of Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) dollars.
The dashboard starts by showing what percent of the allocations align with the building blocks of an inclusive recovery, which are five strategies for spending that direct funds to support equity and inclusion. These five building blocks are: create jobs for those who face the greatest barriers to employment, connect historically excluded residents to jobs and economic opportunities, reinvest in disinvested communities, stabilize housing and expand affordable housing, and create opportunities for low-wealth households to build wealth. As of 08/22/23, 65% of the dollars in the City of Rochester and Monroe County were allocated toward programs and initiatives that align with these building blocks.
The dashboard then shows more broadly how funds are being spent by policy area and subtopic. Next, it explores how well the allocations align with Rochester Area Community Foundation’s priorities. Finally, it shows how the City of Rochester’s SLFRF capital investments map onto racial characteristics of neighborhoods within the region, as well as how they overlap with the original redlining maps for the city. (Redlining refers to the process in which borrowers are denied access to credit due to the racial composition of their neighborhood.) At the end of the dashboard is a table showing all of the allocations and their descriptions in detail.
Note that this dashboard does not track outcomes from these investments – it only shows where the dollars are flowing. Simply allocating funds toward topics that could increase equity and inclusion does not guarantee that they do so. Future research efforts should closely monitor outcomes and impacts from the recovery dollar investments to ensure that they close equity gaps exacerbated by the pandemic and address the root causes of inequities.
How Much is Being Spent on an Inclusive Recovery?
Previous work by the Urban Institute identified five building blocks of an inclusive recovery. These building blocks were created in collaboration with community stakeholders across the country and include:
- Create jobs for residents hardest hit by the pandemic or who face the greatest barriers to employment
- Connect residents to jobs and economic opportunities, including through workforce development, child care, transportation, or broadband
- Reinvest in disinvested communities and address long-standing disparities in access to education, capital, economic opportunities, and climate resilience
- Stabilize housing and expand affordable housing options for low-income households and housing-insecure renters
- Create opportunities for low-wealth households to build wealth.
Across all allocations for the city and county, 65% of the funding has been allocated towards these strategies that promote inclusive recovery and equitable growth. The figure below shows the total amount of funding for Rochester and Monroe County that was allocated to programs that align with these building blocks, based on review of the program description and goals. 55% of the City of Rochester’s funds were allocated toward the building blocks of an inclusive recovery, whereas 85% of Monroe County’s were.
What types of inclusive recovery strategies are supported?
Out of the funds allocated to programs that align with the five building blocks of an inclusive recovery, the most funding has been allocated to reinvesting in disinvested communities, while the least has been allocated to creating jobs for residents hardest hit by the pandemic or who face the greatest barriers to employment. The figure below shows how that funding is divided among the five building blocks and includes only the funds allocated to programs that align with the building blocks.
What policy areas are being funded?
The City of Rochester and Monroe County have allocated almost $301M of SLFRF funds, and, of those, 14.6% have been reported as spent. The figure below shows how that funding has been allocated across policy categories and includes all allocations, not just those that align with the building blocks of an inclusive recovery.
By category, most of the funds have been allocated to community and economic development, infrastructure, and housing, while the least have been allocated to operations, public health and covid-19 response, and social services.
What subtopics are funded within each policy area?
The figure below provides a more detailed breakdown of allocations to each policy area. Each policy area tab breaks down the allocations into subtopics. For example, most of the money allocated to community and economic development has gone to workforce development.
How does funding align with the Rochester Area Community Foundation’s priorities?
The Rochester Area Community Foundation’s key priorities for investment in the region include:
Closing the academic achievement and opportunity gap;
Fostering racial and ethnic understanding and equity;
Partnering against poverty;
Supporting arts and culture; Preserving historic assets;
Advancing environmental justice and sustainability; and
Promoting successful aging.
Overall, 61.1% of SLFRF funding has been allocated towards these priority areas. The figure below shows how SLFRF funding is divided among the priority topics and includes only the funds allocated to programs that align with one of RACF’s priority areas.
Which neighborhoods are the funds being spent in?
The map below shows how the City of Rochester’s SLFRF capital investments map onto racial characteristics of neighborhoods, as well as the original Federal redlining maps for the city. Click on the tabs at the top to see how they overlap with the percent of residents who are Black in a neighborhood and the percent of residents who are Hispanic/Latino1.
Redlining refers to the system that the Federal Housing Administration and the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation used to grade the profitability of neighborhoods in the late 1930s. The four categories were green (“best”), blue (“still desirable”), yellow (“definitely declining”), and red (“hazardous”). These grades were largely based on the neighborhood’s racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and religious composition. Generally, white, middle-class neighborhoods received FHA home loans, whereas many Black and Hispanic/Latino neighborhoods were deemed hazardous and declining in value and did not receive FHA insured mortgages or loans. These maps had long lasting effects on racial segregation, homeownership, and house values in redlined neighborhoods.
To increase equity in the region, leaders must overinvest in communities that have been underinvested in historically. These investments must be those that benefit incumbent residents, meaning that they should not be investments that only benefit new, incoming wealthier residents, or those that have negative impacts on immediate neighbors, like a sewage treatment facility or a highway that pollutes the air. And, they must be investments that community members want, particularly historically excluded members. The maps below give us a first approximation of how equitably investments are distributed, but further exploration of how these investments align with the goals of community members and how much they benefit historically excluded residents is necessary to ensure that they are increasing equity within those communities.
Explore All Programs Funded
This table shows all programs that the City of Rochester and Monroe County have allocated SLFRF funds to, as well as their building block, policy area, policy subtopic, and RACF priority area category. The default display on the table shows the programs in order from largest to smallest allocation. You can use the arrows next to each column title to sort the table by that column, and you can use the search bars under each column or the overall search bar to search the table.
Note: Data on spending were only available from the City of Rochester
Data current as of: 08/22/23
About the Dashboard
This dashboard was created by the Urban Institute in partnership with and support from The Rochester Area Community Foundation (RACF) to visualize Monroe County and the City of Rochester’s ARPA spending by the five building blocks of inclusive recovery, policy category, and RACF’s investment priorities. By tracking recovery funding expenditures, this dashboard allows us to monitor public spending by the categories most critical in supporting an inclusive recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic.
For more information about the dashboard, please contact Meg Norris (The Rochester Area community Foundation) or Christina Stacy (Urban Institute).
Click For Glossary of Terms
The code used to create this dashboard was writen by Manuel Alcalá Kovalski and can be found on GitHub.
Footnotes
We use the term “Hispanic/Latino” in this map because this is the term used in the data collected by the American Community Survey. We recognize that this may not be the preferred identifier for all, and we remain committed to employing inclusive language whenever possible. ↩︎